|
Consent to use your personal information:
If you agree, KPMG International will use your business contact
information to follow up with you regarding the assessment and your responses.
Unless specified here, you are not required to submit any personal information
to participate in the survey.
By submitting your email address, you consent to KPMG in the UK
processing your data for the purposes of this assessment. In some cases,
assessment responses will be aggregated and remain anonymous for purposes of
benchmarking. Your personal information and individual responses are not shared
with other respondents.
For more information about how we use your personal
information, please see our KPMG UK Privacy Policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please select the level of maturity per trait that reflects your care system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated care
network:
Nine traits |
|
Adhoc |
Tactical |
Focused |
Strategic |
Pervasive |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
Level 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Envisioning a
patient-centered
system |
|
Care delivery is designed around organizations, a paradigm shift is needed which focuses on patient-centered integrated care |
The care system has a shared vision which promotes integrated care but is still organizationally focused |
The system can demonstrate that it designs and delivers integrated care pathways which improves patient outcomes |
Care pathways and networks demonstrate improved outcomes, patient experience and it reduces waste/cost |
The system is patient-centered, demonstrates system-wide improved outcomes and better population health management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adhoc |
Tactical |
Focused |
Strategic |
Pervasive |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
Level 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Engaging patients
as co-designers |
|
No patients were
involved in care design |
Patient is a client (e.g., represented by patient advocacy orgs, some quality-indicators used etc.) |
Patients are represented in the design process (e.g., on boards, consulted when new plans are released) |
Patients are influential in the design process (e.g., using PROMs or PREMs, inform the design of pathways, etc.) |
Patients are co-creators who are part of the design and decision-making process related to planning care across the full continuum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adhoc |
Tactical |
Focused |
Strategic |
Pervasive |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
Level 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Bold leadership
manages the change |
|
Focus on individual organization |
A move from a focus on the organization to the system |
Leaders work together to develop integrated care networks |
Leaders work together, develop integrated care networks, and collaborative relationships |
Strong, bold and visionary leadership and effective co-production underpin the whole process and leaders openly hold each other to account |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adhoc |
Tactical |
Focused |
Strategic |
Pervasive |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
Level 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Care happens in the
right setting |
|
High levels of attendance and avoidable or inappropriate admissions at the hospital |
Demand management, referral management and discharge planning are in place |
Demand management, referral management and discharge plans schemes are measured and reduce avoidable attendances and admissions
|
System wide working to deliver integrated care, improved patient pathways/
networks and joined-up data/IT |
Fully integrated system, care happens in the right setting and evidenced with real-time data, improved outcomes and reporting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adhoc |
Tactical |
Focused |
Strategic |
Pervasive |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
Level 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Draws on a broad
array of partners |
|
Little or no alignment. Stakeholders have informal and ad hoc relationships |
A mapping of the health and care system has been undertaken and joint working has been explored |
Stakeholders meet and have joint plans in place and deliver elements of care together |
A formal partnership/
alliance is in place, stakeholders are aligned and work collaborativel |
The partners deliver seamless integrated care, incentives are aligned and user satisfaction is high |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adhoc |
Tactical |
Focused |
Strategic |
Pervasive |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
Level 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Incentives are
aligned to the right
outcomes |
|
There is no scrutiny of cost efficiency or quality incentives linked to care |
There are ad hoc measures to try to reduce spend and/or improve quality |
Cost efficiency incentives (e.g., risk sharing, capitated budgets, etc.) are present |
Quality incentives (e.g., outcome measures, bonus payments for quality) are present |
Both cost efficiency and quality incentives are present in the system and encourage the right behaviors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adhoc |
Tactical |
Focused |
Strategic |
Pervasive |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
Level 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Uses technology
to enable care
delivery |
|
Technology infrastructure and clinical systems are in place (EPR) but information is used in silos |
Health Information exchange (HIE) developed, and some information is used to make decisions/
plans on care delivery |
Insight is derived from the data to design and deliver effective targeted care, digital technology is used to enhance patient pathways |
Digital technology is used across patient pathways with real time data collected and used to improve patient care |
End to end integrated technology which supports predictive analytics, personalized medicine and interventions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adhoc |
Tactical |
Focused |
Strategic |
Pervasive |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
Level 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Building the
workforce to
deliver |
|
There is understaffing and gaps in required knowledge and skills and no workforce system plan |
The system has the right skills and knowledge but is understaffed and doesn’t coordinate resources effectively |
The system still has staffing gaps but works together to provide the skills and knowledge and has developed a plan |
The system has the right mix of staff, knowledge and skills to deliver integrated care |
The system has the right mix of staff, knowledge and skills to deliver integrated care. Technology is used to take over tasks and skills where appropriate. Tasks moved to lower levels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adhoc |
Tactical |
Focused |
Strategic |
Pervasive |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
Level 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Good governance
across an
integrated care
network |
Loose governance arrangements with lack of clarity on decision making, and slow decision making hampering progress |
Internal and external stakeholders are involved in the process of developing the strategic plan, to ensure alignment to broader interests |
Roles and functions of good governance are aligned and defined and agreement on level of governance |
Clear aspirations and KPIs in place, decisive action is agreed and taken |
Leaders hold each other to account with clear lines of accountability to optimize integrated care |
|
|
|
|
|
|